Paste the text. It scores four things that decide whether anyone writes to you, names every stock phrase it finds, and tells you what to put there instead.
Free, no account, no limit. Runs entirely in your browser, so your bio is never sent anywhere.
A bio gets you opened. What you write after that is the part that decides anything.
| Score | What it measures | Why it decides anything |
|---|---|---|
| Specific | Named things: places, titles, numbers, the actual noun rather than the category | A detail is the only thing a stranger can grip. "Hiking" is a category; "the Wind Rivers in September" is a handle |
| Answerable | Whether there is an opening in the text: a question, an invitation, or a claim worth arguing with | Most people want to write to you and cannot think of anything. A bio with a way in does that work for them |
| Fresh | How much of it is phrasing that appears on thousands of other profiles | A line that would be equally true about the next forty profiles is costing you space and returning nothing |
| Shape | Length, sentence breaks, and whether it is a wall | It is read in about three seconds on a phone, in portrait, one-handed. Shape is most of whether it gets read |
| What people write | What does the job |
|---|---|
| Love to travel | Three weeks in Oaxaca taught me I am a confident person who cannot order breakfast |
| Foodie | I will drive forty minutes for a good bagel and I have a shortlist |
| Fluent in sarcasm | I lose arguments about films I have not seen |
| Looking for someone who makes me laugh | Tell me the worst film you genuinely love. I will not judge, I will rank it |
| Work hard, play hard | I build bridges, badly, in a simulator, and then watch them fall down |
| Ask me anything | Ask me about the time I got banned from a quiz night |
| Dog dad | My dog is a nine-year-old beagle who is afraid of the bin |
| I like being outdoors | Saturday is a long walk and a bad pub lunch, and I will defend both |
Every right-hand example here is invented for illustration. The point is the shape of the sentence, not the content: one named thing, one admission, and something a stranger can reply to without thinking hard.
Read your bio and ask what somebody could write to you using only what is in it. If the honest answer is "hey, how's your week going", the bio did not do its job, regardless of how well written it is. A bio is not a description of you. It is a set of handles.
This is also why the scoring weights Specific and Answerable most heavily. A charming bio with no handles produces polite nothing. A plain bio with two handles produces conversations, and conversations are the only thing any of this is for.
The bio is one of three things, and it is not the first one anyone sees:
And once the profile is working, the problem moves: first messages, then keeping it going.
No. The scoring is JavaScript running on your device. There is no request, no logging, no cookie and no storage, and the page works with your connection turned off.
Fifteen to sixty words scores best here, and the reason is mechanical rather than aesthetic: under fifteen words there is usually nothing concrete in it, and over about a hundred it stops being read before the good part. The number is not the point. One specific thing plus one way in is, and that normally lands in that range on its own.
Because a stock phrase is true about almost everyone, which is what makes it useless rather than untrue. If a sentence would be just as true about the next forty profiles, it is taking up space without telling anyone anything. Swap it for the version only you could have written.
No, and this page will not pretend otherwise. Photos are looked at first and decide whether the text is read at all. The bio decides what happens next, which is the part people actually get stuck on, and it is also the part you can rewrite in five minutes at no cost.